2 ms·
It's terribly vague and offers no insight as to which things Marx might have been right about. There's a child comment that's a bit better, but it dumps a lot
by Natsu 11y ago
It's terribly vague and offers no insight as to which things Marx might have been right about. There's a child comment that's a bit better, but it dumps a lot of Wikipedia links out with little in the way of explanation.
In short, on HN it's better if you can explore ideas more thoroughly, rather than simply tossing out short quips and assuming everyone is on the same page.
It would be better to write something along the lines of 'When the article says __, this illustrates what Marx was talking about when he defined __ and that ties in with...' or such so there could be more discussion about ideas and less noise about voting or simple opinions.
- unclebucknasty 11y agoOr it could be viewed as a provocative, open-ended question, inviting exploration by those more versed on Marx's work.
- Natsu 11y agoStone Soup has to start with someone putting in at least a stone's worth.
- unclebucknasty 11y agoThe measure of a stone is clearly subjective.
- Natsu 11y agoIndeed, which is why I was pointing at the rough consensus we have observed.