3 ms·
>That money was already spent on basic necessities of life and can't be recovered Presumably, if the training were significant enough to be worth the company p
by unclebucknasty 11y ago
>That money was already spent on basic necessities of life and can't be recovered
Presumably, if the training were significant enough to be worth the company pursuing it and the now ex-employee found it economically better to use those skills elsewhere, then there might be significant enough income against which to make a claim.
- CydeWeys 11y agoIf this worked you'd think it would be more widespread, but instead corporations have consistently pushed in the opposite direction with workers over the past few decades. There used to be a lot more job security, on-the-job training, and apprenticing. Corporations have figured that not having all that stuff is in their favor as by only hiring qualified people they can put the costs of the training on the employees, and then if there aren't enough qualified people, well, off-shore production.
- unclebucknasty 11y ago>If this worked you'd think it would be more widespread Yeah, that was my original question. I think what you're saying is true to an extent. At the same time, a lot of companies complain that positions simply go unfilled.