3 ms·
Yeah United the same on my 787 journeys. Truly the worst staff in the world consistently. However, 787 does have pressurization and humidity features as well a
by cylinder 11y ago
Yeah United the same on my 787 journeys. Truly the worst staff in the world consistently.
However, 787 does have pressurization and humidity features as well and these made a huge reduction in my jet lag over the 777 and A380
- rosser 11y agoSeriously, the cabin climate changes on Dreamliners make 10-hour flights feel more like 6-hour flights to me, in terms of how useless I am at remembering my name and why I'm visiting upon reaching the immigration counter in the destination country.
- rgo 11y agoI thought A380 and 787 had equivalent cabin pressure of 6000 ft with similar humidity features. That said, I unfortunately did not notice any reduction in tiredness or jet lag in either plane compared to older aircraft. But I did enjoy the lower noise levels and higher stability of the A380, which make for a more pleasant journey overall. I feel less worn off when I land, which means I'll take less to recover from the flight itself, which I find more damaging then the time zone differences.
- cylinder 11y agoagree. The a380 is tremendous, especially when combined with Qantas service.
- dzhiurgis 11y agoI second the pressurisation and humidity features. Also, they use electric compressors instead of bleed air, which helps to reduce engine fumes in cabin. These things made my trip significantly better.