3 ms·
The document hasn't been composed in LaTeX. That's usually a pretty big red flag. However, the other big red flags common to crankwork -- excessive philosophic
by johnloeber 11y ago
The document hasn't been composed in LaTeX. That's usually a pretty big red flag.
However, the other big red flags common to crankwork -- excessive philosophical musing, violation of the lemma-proof-theorem structure -- are absent. I'll wait on some peer-review and hopefully a translation into English.
- raverbashing 11y agoAlso, legitimate papers never are titled/abstracted with only "this is a solution to Famous Problem" but are more specific to what it solves/relates to Example: "Modular elliptic curves and Fermat's Last Theorem"
- paulpauper 11y agooften a proof will hinge on a key conjecture, so the paper is named after the conjecture
- pmar3003 11y agoIs it usual for mathematical papers to be so badly written (layout)?
- johnloeber 11y agoThe author's layout looks pretty normal to me (aside from it not being in LaTeX). For reference, here's a good math paper by Noam Elkies with fairly standard layout: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.07541.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.07541.pdf