Note the original study[1] is awfully underpowered; the reported effect is weak and highly equivocal; and it reeks of 'researcher degrees of freedom' bias --so

Note the original study[1] is awfully underpowered; the reported effect is weak and highly equivocal; and it reeks of 'researcher degrees of freedom' bias --so caveat lector. (It's PLOS One, after all.) [1] http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0149885 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal....