4 ms·
> "hashbang" URLs (they call them Escaped Fragment URLs) why not use the RFC terms? https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3 https://tools.ietf.org/html/r
by profeta 10y ago
> "hashbang" URLs (they call them Escaped Fragment URLs)
why not use the RFC terms? https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3 "url fragment"
Also, it won't help you on server side rendering since the server will never even see it on the request.
- rmccue 10y agoA hashbang is specifically a fragment starting with a ! character, hence "hashbang".
- TazeTSchnitzel 10y ago> Also, it won't help you on server side rendering since the server will never even see it on the request. It will when Googlebot sees the link and rewrites the URL.
- tyingq 10y ago>>why not use the RFC terms? Because it's specifically different, on purpose. The RFC doesn't cover the "bang" part....the "!". >>the server will never even see it on the request Explained on the (now deprecated) page from Google on this "hashbang" approach: *"The answer is the URL that is requested by the crawler: the crawler will modify each AJAX URL such as www.example.com/ajax.html#!key=value to temporarily become www.example.com/ajax.html?_escaped_fragment_=key=value"