What do you find misleading? The absence of 100%? Or the age ranges they chose? The bar graphs might visually amplify the gap, but 1.1 million lines versus mor

What do you find misleading? The absence of 100%? Or the age ranges they chose? The bar graphs might visually amplify the gap, but 1.1 million lines versus more than 5 million is a real gap, for example. If anything, they gave us 2 different views on the data, and that double ;-) what we usually get.