Politics is the mindkiller. It opens with the assumption that everyone shares the author's policy prescriptions. How can anyone write about politics and think

Politics is the mindkiller. It opens with the assumption that everyone shares the author's policy prescriptions. How can anyone write about politics and think that it's full of issues with only one obvious answer? Is it through screening all interactions to avoid anyone with different opinions? And there's no reason to single Frank out on this. Why does almost everyone on both sides of the aisle write and talk about politics in exactly this way?