4 ms·

Another date for you: there's an HTML comment in the <head>  It's possible that it's referring to the HTML

Another date for you: there's an HTML comment in the <head>  It's possible that it's referring to the HTML skeleton, not the article itself.

dang 10y ago
Bravo for finding a bit of actual textual evidence. Let's use 1999; it's at least an upper bound.
- j_koreth 10y ago
  Actually I heard of him stopping to use email during the late 80's and such
  - dang 10y ago
    That's consistent with cpr's post. But the article was clearly written later.