4 ms·
You shouldn't trust Mathematica either. It has had bugs in the past [0]. Also it didn't have a proper "undo" feature until a year or so ago, which is pretty em
by gaur 11y ago
You shouldn't trust Mathematica either. It has had bugs in the past [0].
Also it didn't have a proper "undo" feature until a year or so ago, which is pretty embarrassing.
[0] http://www.ams.org/notices/201410/rnoti-p1249.pdf http://www.ams.org/notices/201410/rnoti-p1249.pdf
- tagrun 11y agoI don't think his point was "Mathematica contains zero bugs".
- oneloop 11y agoMy point was "this piece of software surely has more bugs than Mathematica". What's your point? That because they both have a non-zero number of bugs we should be equally suspicious of both?
- gaur 11y ago> My point was "this piece of software surely has more bugs than Mathematica". It sounded like your point was "I trust Mathematica, but not this open-source CAS". Otherwise you would have just said "I don't trust CASs".