In creating such a society we are placing ourselves in chains and handing the key to some trusted third party. Maybe we wont be abused at first but given a hund

In creating such a society we are placing ourselves in chains and handing the key to some trusted third party. Maybe we wont be abused at first but given a hundred year time scale the probability of abuse approaches 1. How many of the US presidents over the last 100 years would you be comfortable giving this power to? >"Perfect enforcement" sounds only as horrible as the culture behind it is, to me. But we know how terrible the culture behind it is. We have thousands of years of history. "The strong do as they please and the weak suffer as they must." >And does perfect enforcement really mean minds can't changed, that the law can't be changed after it's created if it's understood that actions X, Y, or Z actually aren't against the universal bill of rights for living entities? Whoever holds the reins of power can make of the law as they see fit. At this level of power imbalance laws don't really exist, "L'etat c'est moi".