It's very odd that a letter written in purely legalese terms receives a reply that is mainly hand-waving and pointless in the remarks that are made (as if all t

It's very odd that a letter written in purely legalese terms receives a reply that is mainly hand-waving and pointless in the remarks that are made (as if all the details given by Brave/Eich weren't already known). Doesn't strike me as particularly brilliant, but IANAL etc. I also wonder how long until Brendan Eich is just "Brendan Eich" and not "Mozilla former CEO". I can't imagine Mozilla is very happy with being associated with a competitor, especially in a situation like this.