3 ms·
This post is so wrong in so many ways. First, it is extremely bad practice to leave commitments of any kind open in perpetuity. Secondly, if you are looking to
by matco11 11y ago
This post is so wrong in so many ways. First, it is extremely bad practice to leave commitments of any kind open in perpetuity.
Secondly, if you are looking to hire 3000 monkeys and you are searching for people that are good enough to pass you minimum standards, sure you can wait one month and see if each candidate you make an offer to joins your company. What if you are hiring only 20 people, 10 of which for very specific, key roles? You want the PERFECT candidate for the position, and you cannot keep the process open forever. you have a budget, you cannot make multiple offers for the only one position you have to fill?!
Third, you do want to know if the candidate wants to accept the offer because he likes your company and the position or because he cannot find anything better. Many would argue that is much better to hire a candidate that would put passion in what he does, rather than hiring a mercenary.
Finally, what other business activity do you do without a clear timing commitment?
- astanway 11y agoYou refer to engineers as "monkeys", it's clear you don't have any respect for them in the first place.
- CapitalistCartr 11y agoQuite the opposite. You misread him. He's contrasting hiring generic labor to hiring specialized, skilled talent.
- matco11 11y agoExactly. That is exactly what I meant. Thank you.
- matco11 11y agoQuite the opposite. I am making the point for an approach that does NOT treat them like monkeys!