3 ms·
In my opinion, the most compelling reason is that many people are there. There's nothing Google or Microsoft can't do that facebook is doing, technologically,
by sidcool 11y ago
In my opinion, the most compelling reason is that many people are there. There's nothing Google or Microsoft can't do that facebook is doing, technologically, what they lack is people. I still feel facebook is a good platform for running private groups. For others it gives an audience to show off, not necessarily a bad thing.
Facebook is what every individual wants but is hesitant of accepting.
- dingaling 11y ago> In my opinion, the most compelling reason is that many people are there. Yes, I've seen this in action with real-world groups that form a Facebook group to replace a mailing list, or ( shudder ) a Yahoo Group. 99.99% of their recipients are already on Facebook, it's free-at-point-of-use and it supports group functions. So they go ahead, freezing-out the ones who aren't on Facebook with quotes like 'just create an account, it's free'. I'd join Facebook if I could pay a subscription fee each month so as not to be analysed and advertised-to, just to rejoin many groups that have moved there.