3 ms·
I agree, but I've fallen in love with Purescript[0] recently instead, and its made it easier to ease into Haskell. Although to be honest, I prefer Purescript as
by girvo 11y ago
I agree, but I've fallen in love with Purescript[0] recently instead, and its made it easier to ease into Haskell. Although to be honest, I prefer Purescript as a language!
[0] http://www.purescript.org/ http://www.purescript.org/
- nv-vn 11y agoI could see that. I find that Haskell specifically is very hard to ease into, whereas a lot of similar languages are much easier. For me, I wasn't comfortable with my Haskell skills until I learned Idris, which is arguably a more difficult language -- ironically, I found the Idris documentation to be a lot more user friendly than Haskell's just because it comes from the official team (and I'm sure that Purescript is like this too). For anyone struggling to learn Haskell, I'd probably recommend a different purely functional language first (at least until haskellbook comes out).
- kyllo 11y agoThat's because PureScript is what Haskell would be if it were written in the last 2-3 years starting from a clean slate. It doesn't have to deal with legacy code.