3 ms·
thanks. nobody really has any points of difference between my analogy and their behavior. To make it more explicit, I suppose there could be a click-through o
by logicallee 11y ago
thanks. nobody really has any points of difference between my analogy and their behavior.
To make it more explicit, I suppose there could be a click-through or something that sets a cookie "I-agree-to-load-ads-in-exchange-for-requesting-content-from-this-site", so that you have to start by clicking that. It's rather moot, though, as that is precisely what sites do that choose not to serve those users who use ad-block. Those users typically still try to get the content from the sites anyway. So they would likely agree to the transaction, before failing to uphold their end.
- untog 11y agoI'm waiting for someone to chime in with the "it isn't like stealing because no physical goods are taken" argument that always gets thrown out in piracy debates. It's not wrong, but it is irrelevant.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]