4 ms·
I think you're half there, but in the end I stand by it just being kind of poor writing. It's not so much a development of prose tending towards shorter sentenc
by ubercore 11y ago
I think you're half there, but in the end I stand by it just being kind of poor writing. It's not so much a development of prose tending towards shorter sentences. Rather, the author is making a stylistic choice that uses longer sentences while _also_ loading the sentences with structural aberrations and external, sometimes opaque, references.
I'd argue that it's always been a good idea to use style judiciously in prose, and balance longer more complex sentence structure with fewer references or other oddities. Or load up unusual structure and abstruse language, but keep things shorter.
- kbenson 11y agoI won't deny that longer sentences often seem to be the result of authors trying to shoe-horn more than they should into the sentence, and that appears to be the case here. Length is a bit less subjective (IMO, which of course makes it subjective... ;) though, so I figured it might be easier to approach the argument from that direction.