> You are attacking someone who has been in business longer than the service you are advocating on the basis of you knowing their financial situation better tha

> You are attacking someone who has been in business longer than the service you are advocating on the basis of you knowing their financial situation better than they do. Maybe you should consider that isn't a good position to be taking in general rather than resorting to personal attacks? I think you're seriously overreacting. You could have easily responded to the OP's point without the condescension and calling them "clueless". I didn't think the OP seemed like an attack at all, rather just skepticism. Your response, however, seems very much like an unwarranted personal attack.