2 ms·
How is this not a violation of the CFAA? Why isn't Forbes being held responsible and prosecuted? So if I go and access one file whose name is not public on Forb
by joesmo 11y ago
How is this not a violation of the CFAA? Why isn't Forbes being held responsible and prosecuted? So if I go and access one file whose name is not public on Forbes' website, I'm looking at least at 5-10 years in jail but Forbes can infect millions and they get off scott free. The problem isn't ad blockers, the problem is the ad networks. They are criminal and should be held responsible. They should be shut down like any other spam network. They should be made to pay. And anyone who uses these criminal networks to infect computers is an accomplice and should be treated so.
At the very least, the people who are anti ad blockers will hopefully shut the fuck up now because they're wrong and it's not a matter of opinion.