4 ms·
For a while now I've been thinking about something like this: once a month I put some amount of money in my "browser account". Maybe it's $25, or $10, maybe som
by kaffeinecoma 10y ago
For a while now I've been thinking about something like this: once a month I put some amount of money in my "browser account". Maybe it's $25, or $10, maybe sometimes it's nothing at all. This money gets automatically distributed to the sites I visit, potentially subject to a white/black list that I control. Payments automated, cryptographically secure. I never see an ad or run ad-related JS. And the sites that I support get my patronage as directly as possible. Edit: oh, and somehow my privacy is magically preserved. Small detail. :-)
Maybe that's too close to the "public radio" model, and would never work at scale, but I'd pay for it.
- trophycase 10y agoIt's just like cable used to be! Before they started serving ads anyway...
- tracker1 10y agoMost cable networks always showed ads, other than the premium channels (hbo, sho, etc)... They used to show fewer ads though... and the shows are now, mostly slotted to 44 minutes of show (give or take), closer to 36 for reality TV. So the rest gets filled with ads.. because money.
- Karunamon 10y agoI think you just described the basic concept of Brave, Brendan Eich's browser project. https://www.brave.com/about.html https://www.brave.com/about.html
- bduerst 10y agoYou just described this: https://www.google.com/contributor/welcome/ https://www.google.com/contributor/welcome/
- malchow 10y agoThe only thing I fear with this (Brave) is that it is gameable. Whenever you create a pot of money, it will be gamed. Someone will come up with the Brave equivalent of a "One weird trick slideshow!" to extract maximum dollars. Subscriptions, however, are consumer-empowering. And everyone gets how they work. (Netflix, Prime, etc.)