4 ms·
I think you are mixing the concerns of configuration managers and package managers. They are at different abstraction points. Step one: install software and its
by sergiosgc 11y ago
I think you are mixing the concerns of configuration managers and package managers. They are at different abstraction points. Step one: install software and its dependencies (package manager). Step two: Have all the software services in your cluster talk to each other (configuration manager). Step three is profit.
- lisivka 11y agoNo, I am not mixing them. I just skipping step two, because it can be done automagically after step one.
- sergiosgc 11y agoIt can. Is it efficient? No. This is so obvious that I'll have to attribute your opinion to lack of experience. Try deploying a stack with a dozen different services, designed with fault tolerance and horizontal scalability in mind, where each service is clustered, without a configuration manager. Then, review your opinion.
- lisivka 11y agoI have 25 years of experience. 19 years with Linux alone. Yes, I deployed stacks with dozen of different services. Typical distro has hundreds of services.