Zdziarski seems to think it is quite dangerous. Thoughts? http://www.zdziarski.com/blog/?p=6046 http://www.zdziarski.com/blog/?p=6046 I see the limitation clau

Zdziarski seems to think it is quite dangerous. Thoughts? http://www.zdziarski.com/blog/?p=6046 http://www.zdziarski.com/blog/?p=6046 I see the limitation clause and so forth, but some of the language still seems pretty broad and dangerous. In fact the way it is worded, it nearly contradicts itself, calling for "design limitation" yet requiring things that will inevitably require a design change. Which part of that contradiction would be upheld in the event this becomes law?