> We're strangers to each other. Don't call me "dishonest" Then don't engage in name-calling of people you haven't met. It's inherently dishonest and I stand

> We're strangers to each other. Don't call me "dishonest" Then don't engage in name-calling of people you haven't met. It's inherently dishonest and I stand by my assertion. > In person, Yarvin was evidently so flagrantly racist that he was ostracized by other attendees. If this is true, he is no threat and will alienate himself. He will be judged and treated on the merit of his own actions and behavior, without undue influence from the press or name-calling parrots on social media. > I'm guessing you also haven't carefully read the Mencius Moldbug posts that kicked all this stuff off (that's fine: he writes in a deliberately obscurantist fashion in order to foment exactly these kinds of misunderstandings). It doesn't matter. You failed to base your puerile name-calling in any manner of argument whatsoever. That is inherently dishonest. > People aren't making this stuff up about him. So you say, but do not explain. The most you've been able to do is relate is both hearsay and simple opinion (no facts). Until you explain, stop calling him names, or I will not stop calling you dishonest.