3 ms·

Couldn't this argument be made about all languages? People into dynamically typed languages would have statically typed languages for the same "don't touch my

by dudul 11y ago

Couldn't this argument be made about all languages? People into dynamically typed languages would have statically typed languages for the same "don't touch my identity!" reason. I personally don't "hate" go. To be honest, I have barely read 20 lines of go ever. But I do not like the idea of a language specifically designed to limit my possibilities. I want to keep seeing "programming" as an art and a creative activity. Not as a factory-like process where there is only one way to do thing, all developers are inter-changeable, etc. I get why it's interesting for big corpos like Google. I just don't have to like it :)

blueprint 11y ago
Nature works in the same way that it limits us to the fact that an effect can only be obtained by its commensurate cause. Anything is possible through that law as long as the appropriate cause can be formed.
- talles 11y ago
  What??
  - blueprint 11y ago
    In math, answers are made by questions. In life, the quality of your answers is determined by the quality of your questions. So make a concrete question based in reality if you want a specific, real answer that you can confirm against proof.
    - talles 11y ago
      Wow, you did all that nature analogy to say that the misunderstanding lies in the question and not in the answers?
      - blueprint 11y ago
        That's incorrect. I was talking about your useless "What??"