3 ms·
I go by what the IPCC states. As poor as its past performance has been in refining the science into accurate predictions, it is by far the best source of "scien
by merpnderp 11y ago
I go by what the IPCC states. As poor as its past performance has been in refining the science into accurate predictions, it is by far the best source of "scientific consensus" we have. And there have been many papers published over the last 20 years claiming a whole number of things.
James Hansen has been wrong so many times in the past, I'm not sure why anyone still listens to him. And if you have any feel for the data at all, several meters of sea rise in 50 years should strike you as nearly impossible. There's certainly no strong (or even weak) evidence for this.
- vonmoltke 11y agoHansen, at this point, is about supporting his preconceived notions rather than trying to understand what is actually going on with the climate system.