3 ms·
> It's more about the spam for already-fixed features than the love of keeping users secure. I realize this is the reason presented in the comment, but after I
by drewcrawford 11y ago
> It's more about the spam for already-fixed features than the love of keeping users secure.
I realize this is the reason presented in the comment, but after I dug into his statements elsewhere, I developed a different picture. Anyway, there's no law that says a comment must present every argument why the code exists.
To step back a minute, I seem to be seeing the same facts very differently. Where some see an immature attempt to annoy users, I see a demonstration that Debian is unable to spot a bug when it has a 50-line comment above it complaining that Debian doesn't fix bugs.
To me, the very existence of this situation itself is a powerful argument against Debian stable as a working concept. Most of the time a bug is introduced it does not announce itself with a preamble. How the hell did this make it all the way to stable?
- vacri 11y ago> I see a demonstration that Debian is unable to spot a bug when it has a 50-line comment above it That's also an unfair characterisation, especially since the original report starts out recognising that exact comment. Debian stable is there for a reason - not everyone is in a position where they can have the latest'n'greatest rolling distro. Security is not the only thing that's of interest to users; stability is of interest as well. I see people using rolling distros that get caught up by this bug or that bug, and they can fix it because they're technically-minded, but not everyone can do that. This xscreensaver issue is an edge case that gets caught in the cracks. I'm sure jwz is also well aware of why debian stable does what it does, but as the recipient of the bugspam, he can probably be forgiven for being less than charitable about deb-stable.
- drewcrawford 11y ago> That's also an unfair characterisation What specifically is unfair about it? Is it false? > especially since the original report starts out recognising that exact comment. I must be missing the part where a postmortem of this feature getting into stable was conducted and lessons were learned. Can you link me? > Debian stable is there for a reason - not everyone is in a position where they can have the latest'n'greatest rolling distro. Yeah, and that's why I run Debian stable. But in light of a visible lapse I'm concerned about invisible ones lurking on my systems.
- vacri 11y agoSuddenly "unable to spot a bug" has transmogrified into requiring a post-mortem and lessons for the future learned? That's some pretty hefty goalpost moving.
- ashitlerferad 11y agoAre there any distributions that audit all source code incoming from either maintainers or upstreams? Are there many software projects that have full peer review of every single commit? Are there many software projects that have more than one developer?