4 ms·
You're opposed on principle to rhetoric?
by tdoggette 17y ago
You're opposed on principle to rhetoric?
- olefoo 17y agoThat's a prejudice that goes back to Plato.
- Tichy 17y agoAm I supposed to like rhetoric?
- halostatue 17y agoLike? No. Understand and be able to use, because it makes a lot more sense to a lot of the people on this Earth? Yes.
- Tichy 17y agoSo you basically agree that it is designed to sway the opinions of people who don't like to think hard about what they hear? Another place I know parables from is the bible. Does that mean I have to be religious?
- halostatue 17y agoNo, I don't agree with that proposition at all. Rhetoric is something you don't have to like, but to dismiss it entirely as you have done in this subthread is to do a disservice to yourself. I happen to find rhetoric fascinating, as it has to do with human communication and interaction. If you've ever given a presentation, you've performed rhetoric (the art of using language to persuade). If you've presented based on measurable facts, you've still used rhetoric. (Indeed, without using other language to help organize and interpret the facts at hand, it's very easy for facts to be used to confuse an issue.) Parables are rhetorical devices usually used to illustrate a moral or religious lesson. Yet, they can also be used to illustrate other lessons, too. A quick search for "secular parables" resulted in the "Parable of the broken window" as a lesson to be learned about economics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window