I have about 12 years of exp. Have worked with all kinds of companies startups\bluechips\valley\wall st etc. Over time I have reduced paying attention to what

I have about 12 years of exp. Have worked with all kinds of companies startups\bluechips\valley\wall st etc. Over time I have reduced paying attention to what they are dangling in front of me, be it compensation or interesting stuff I want to work on. I now mostly pay attention to the people. Specifically the quality AND loyalty of people to the firm\manager\founder etc. The AND is critical. If its just one or the other I walk. So for example, if its a 3 year old team and there is no one "smart" who has lasted atleast 2 years its a good sign to walk. If its a 6 year old firm and there is no one who has lasted atleast 2 years it's a great sign to walk. If there are people who have lasted and aren't "quality" its also not worth it. My definition of quality is they are smarter than me, or have done something I have respect for. If its a new company I don't work with them unless I personally know the people involved. Why these rules? Cause if the people are "right" the interesting work and adequate compensation follows. Doesn't matter if the project fails your time with such folk is never wasted.