2 ms·
Man, whoever redesigns erlang.org needs to think really hard about how they're going to re-work the documentation section. It's really good as is: * Color sche
by simoncion 11y ago
Man, whoever redesigns erlang.org needs to think really hard about how they're going to re-work the documentation section. It's really good as is:
* Color scheme and fonts are easy to read.
* One can switch between API reference for the current module and Users Guide for its containing application with one click.
* On the left-hand-side one has a scrollable tree of modules in the current application, each of which is expandable to reveal the API calls within any given module.
* Sensible URL scheme: doc/man/$MODULE.html for a module's API docs and doc/apps/$APP/users_guide.html for an application's Users Guide.
- RobertKerans 11y agoIt doesn't need much, just very slight tweaks to the typography so it's a bit cleaner + a bit more visual separation between function descriptions + slightly better handling of the navigation. It's just all a little bit jammed together atm, IMO. As I say, wouldn't take much. One thing I've found I love are the PDF documentation downloads; I wasn't expecting much, but (for example, the xmerl one) they're great, step by step useful examples that I can shove on an ereader to go through. Really solid.