3 ms·
http://sfcontroller.org/sites/default/files/FileCenter/Documents/6742-mission_moratorium_final.pdf http://sfcontroller.org/sites/default/files/FileCenter/Docum.
by khuey 11y ago
http://sfcontroller.org/sites/default/files/FileCenter/Documents/6742-mission_moratorium_final.pdf http://sfcontroller.org/sites/default/files/FileCenter/Docum...
"Market-rate housing probably has contributed to gentrification in many cities in the past. But the data shows clearly that, in San Francisco in 2015, market-rate housing development is not accommodating upper-income movers who would otherwise be somehow shut out of the city's housing market. On the contrary, the overwhelming majority of wealthy new residents do not live in new housing, and conversely, the vast majority of new market
rate construction creates housing opportunities for existing city residents. For this reason, we find no reason to believe that either a temporary moratorium, or an indefinite prohibition, of market rate housing will reduce the number of upper-income residents in the Mission, or slow the process of gentrification that the neighborhood has been experiencing."
- muzz 11y agoYes the first sentence is my point.