3 ms·
In my opinion, what you've done there is create a straw man. The original assertion was that an IQ test is a reason to run. What you've done is turn that into s
by EliRivers 11y ago
In my opinion, what you've done there is create a straw man. The original assertion was that an IQ test is a reason to run. What you've done is turn that into something else entirely, where it quite clearly is a bad sign. I believe that your hypothetical situation isn't addressing the original simple assertion.
The original assertion was not "If you've done very well at a series of interviews and proved your ability already, and then they want to give you an IQ test, run."
- zeemonkee3 11y agoSo your argument is that IQ tests are only good in lieu of experience/proven ability?
- EliRivers 11y agoMy argument is that you presented an invalid straw man argument.
- GFK_of_xmaspast 11y agoHow about "you get an IQ test instead of a series of interviews and a chance to prove your ability"
- PhasmaFelis 11y agoSo what's an example of a situation where an IQ test would not be a bad sign?