3 ms·

It's not even their actual board. This is more shenaniganry. It's all they know.

• cpeterso 11y ago
  And how many medical and lab experts were on Theranos's scientific and medical advisory board before they added these eight? The following press release only mentions two other members (one of whom is the CEO). It also uses the future tense to say "Theranos’ Scientific and Medical Advisory Board will meet quarterly." http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160407006056/en/Theranos-Announces-Leading-Medical-Laboratory-Experts-Join http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160407006056/en/Ther...
  • nxzero 11y ago
    Pretty sure before this there was no scientific and medical advisory board, otherwise, why would they be adding so many members to it at once; meaning if that's the case, seems really, really fishy.
    • WalterSear 11y ago
      This company is already Andrea Rossi sketchy. Is is appropriate to flag stories about Theranos? I doesn't seem appropriate to let them have an unfettered voice.
      • nxzero 11y ago
        How is this giving Theranos a "unfettered voice" - seems like the opposite given that there's no one from the company to my knowledge in this thread of comments; yes, I realize the post is a direct link to an article on them.
        • WalterSear 11y ago
          It's a link to an article that has a very misleading headline. It's the kind of 'accident' I've come to expect from Theranos and Theranos's PR.