I don't think that's what this is about. It's about linking to content that violates copyright laws, e.g. running a torrent tracker. > The case arose in the Ne

I don't think that's what this is about. It's about linking to content that violates copyright laws, e.g. running a torrent tracker. > The case arose in the Netherlands where the GeenStijl website had provided a link to an Australian site showing pictures of a Dutch celebrity taken by Playboy magazine. The Australian site did not have Playboy's consent to do so.