4 ms·
well, digital sales only (which are still less than CD and I think streaming/radio + public performance make much more now than by then) are currently worth mor
by makapuf 11y ago
well, digital sales only (which are still less than CD and I think streaming/radio + public performance make much more now than by then) are currently worth more than total music sales in the seventies, which I don't think were a particularly bad time for music creativity. (http://publicradio2.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2014/02/units-vs-dollars-riaa.jpg http://publicradio2.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/files/2014/02/un...)
- amouat 11y ago1) I don't think that graph is adjusted for inflation. 2) I haven't done it, but I'd be willing to put a few quid on the 1970s having the largest proportion of albums in the best of lists e.g. http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/500-greatest-albums-of-all-time-20120531 http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists/500-greatest-albums-... Also 1970s rockstars seemed to have a lot more money than their 2010s equivalents.
- dkfmn 11y agoThis chart is comparing dollars (CD sales) to units (digital singles, which probably avg less than $1.29 each). So at their peak CD sales were worth >10x what digital singles sales are now. It's not even close, and if this chart were inflation-adjusted the difference would be much larger. Forgetting about the Musician's share, all the streaming/satellite radio revenue collectively wouldn't cover the shortfall (terrestrial radio doesn't pay). I can't comment on public performance but it's certainly become the definitive way musicians make money now and their share has always been high in this category.