<snark warning> I have a hard time understanding why people would vote Zuckerberg (unless they are equating that more money means more influence). If he is the

<snark warning> I have a hard time understanding why people would vote Zuckerberg (unless they are equating that more money means more influence). If he is the most influential, I see little evidence that he is using his influence to effect anything meaningful to happen. Facebook has only advanced the status quo since inception (iterative, not innovative). It seems to just blatantly rip off other services to advance their market position (periscope, medium) or just acquires competition (instagram, whatsapp). </snark>