4 ms·

Thanks Mz for the feedback. Freemium could be a potential business model here. "You get X jobs for free, if you are a power user then you pay based on tier".

Mz 11y ago
That was part of the model for Elance. I had an account there and never did any work through them. It was more complicated than just that. But, the service I currently work for does not charge me at all to get work. They charge my clients. They add their cut on top of my fee. The way this works in practice is that I see a different pay scale than my clients see. So, if I say "I will do that job for X" the client sees "She will do that job for (X + Y)" or "She will do that job for 2X" or whatever their formula is for calculating the total fee. I can absolutely set my own rate. There is fine print somewhere that tells me how much they pad it when billing the client. But it is possible for me to relate mentally and emotionally to "I get paid X" and not care what the service charges for their cut because they aren't taking it out of my hide. I would be disinclined to pay a service for the opportunity to access work. Because that means I need to keep working X amount to make it worth my while. In this case, I need to do enough work that I am making more money after paying the fee than I could make for less effort by sticking to the free deal. So, if I can make $100/month without giving you any money but earning $101 or more means you will charge me $20, then I need to make more than $120 every single month to justify paying the fee. That makes it a burden in my mind, not an opportunity. It means I have to be confident that I have the time, energy and interest to do that consistently. It also means you become an albotross around my neck in my mind. This creates a barrier to entry for treating this like a real job. You cannot ramp up at your own pace, as you see fit. There are financial incentives for many people to treat this as just "extra" income and not an avenue to support yourself. This will harm the long term reputation of the service, as well as threaten it's financial survival. What I am telling you as someone who makes most of their earned income via gig work is that your stated ideals of empowering the worker are far better served by adding a surcharge to every job that gets charged to the client, not the worker. That is also more sustainable for the business.

Mz 11y ago

That was part of the model for Elance. I had an account there and never did any work through them. It was more complicated than just that. But, the service I currently work for does not charge me at all to get work. They charge my clients. They add their cut on top of my fee. The way this works in practice is that I see a different pay scale than my clients see. So, if I say "I will do that job for X" the client sees "She will do that job for (X + Y)" or "She will do that job for 2X" or whatever their formula is for calculating the total fee. I can absolutely set my own rate. There is fine print somewhere that tells me how much they pad it when billing the client. But it is possible for me to relate mentally and emotionally to "I get paid X" and not care what the service charges for their cut because they aren't taking it out of my hide. I would be disinclined to pay a service for the opportunity to access work. Because that means I need to keep working X amount to make it worth my while. In this case, I need to do enough work that I am making more money after paying the fee than I could make for less effort by sticking to the free deal. So, if I can make $100/month without giving you any money but earning $101 or more means you will charge me $20, then I need to make more than $120 every single month to justify paying the fee. That makes it a burden in my mind, not an opportunity. It means I have to be confident that I have the time, energy and interest to do that consistently. It also means you become an albotross around my neck in my mind. This creates a barrier to entry for treating this like a real job. You cannot ramp up at your own pace, as you see fit. There are financial incentives for many people to treat this as just "extra" income and not an avenue to support yourself. This will harm the long term reputation of the service, as well as threaten it's financial survival. What I am telling you as someone who makes most of their earned income via gig work is that your stated ideals of empowering the worker are far better served by adding a surcharge to every job that gets charged to the client, not the worker. That is also more sustainable for the business.