4 ms·
Sounds neat! What's the performance tradeoff, if any? How far along development is it? Beta? Production ready?
by asakurasol 11y ago
Sounds neat!
What's the performance tradeoff, if any?
How far along development is it? Beta? Production ready?
- david927 11y agoThank you so much! I don't have direct competitive benchmarks but it reads and writes at around 620k/qps. It's in alpha right now at about 80% of completion.
- ibdknox 11y agoYou have symmetric read and write rates? That's pretty odd. Also if you are writing at that rate, presumably those writes aren't persisted? EDIT: That's also a rate of 1.6us per query. I've never heard of a JSON/REST stack that could take in and return results in that period of time. Are you doing something special to accomplish that?
- david927 11y agoI couldn't remember the write speed but it's about 80% of the read speed. The writes are persisted. The qps rates are for individual look-ups and do not include any HTTP latency, of course.