2 ms·
About a year ago I ran a series of tests where I continuously posted the same 15-20 articles tracking the number of up votes within the first 10-15 minutes. It
by lettergram 11y ago
About a year ago I ran a series of tests where I continuously posted the same 15-20 articles tracking the number of up votes within the first 10-15 minutes.
It turns out it was essentially random, and although every one of the posts were decent enough to make it to the front page 2 or 3 times sometimes it received zero votes, sometimes 10.
It seems somewhat unfair to use the standard ranking system with this being the case, since it's essentially random. I think there would need to be a way to randomly show them to users and have users vote. Similar to /r/starups[1]
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/startups/ https://www.reddit.com/r/startups/
BTW I eventually received an email from the YC staff, thank you for not banning me :) No one should do this.
- danieltillett 11y agoDid you write up this testing? I would love to see some hard number on this effect?
- lettergram 11y agoI have all the data, never published it because I didn't have time... I'll get around to it soon though The data isn't super solid because I was stopped before I got to 50 (which was my goal).
- danieltillett 11y agoYou should ask Dan to let you continue :)