3 ms·

If you need something that works in exactly the way you're used to and that's how you evaluated fossil, then I guess fossil isn't what you need, because fossil

• popmystack 11y ago
  >I'm not sure why you're being toxic and venting frustration Please do not devolve the conversation by making outlandish statements that have no bearing on the conversation. >If you need something that works in exactly the way you're used to and that's how you evaluated fossil That's the exact opposite point I made though. Fossil constrains me in how I work and how I accomplish certain tasks -- with no benefit. Neither Git or Mercurial do that. What Fossil can do, both Git and Mercurial can do better. So why would I choose Fossil?
  • CMay 11y ago
    They're not outlandish statements, you are frustrated. If you don't get any benefit out of a tool, then don't use that tool. I get value out of it and am not meaningfully impacted by the issues you have with it in practice. I'm not a salesman and it's free software, so do what makes sense to you.
    • popmystack 11y ago
      >They're not outlandish statements, you are frustrated. As an expert on myself, I must disagree. >If you don't get any benefit out of a tool, then don't use that tool. I don't use it. But I think you need to remember what I replied to, as that's an ill-placed sentiment in this thread.