3 ms·
I would prefer an anonymous employer/recruiter agent and an anonymous job seeker agent. The job seeker agent contains certain well defined constraints such a
by tmaly 11y ago
I would prefer an anonymous employer/recruiter agent and an anonymous job seeker agent. The job seeker agent contains certain well defined constraints such as area=New York salary > 100k USD skillset=Java industry IN('medical','biotech') status=active
then the employer agents can search for active seekers or passive seekers and present some detailed information about the position. If the seeker is interested, they make contact, if not the employer agent moves on unless told to check back.
- vs2370 11y agogreat idea..took note
- tmaly 11y agoI originally tried to start a startup related to recruiting. I interviewed 40 recruiters. I could not find any specific pattern, so I moved on to other things.
- vs2370 11y agoAh I could see but this is a conscious effort not to make it for recruiters. But it would be great if you could share some more notes from your learning :)
- pavornyoh 11y agoI said this before. The recruiters are not the problem as they are likely not going to give you a lot of info. for fear of losing out. It is the users you have to talk to. I have spent countless hours talking to users and employers over the last 8 months as I am doing something similar to OP. There are so many changes they will like to see with some voiced out here in the thread. There are also many ways to monetize as the employers I spoke with are frustrated and willing to pay for the right service that yield results.