4 ms·
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/nyregion/new-water-tunnel-can-provide-water-for-all-of-manhattan.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/nyregion/new-water-tun
by koenigdavidmj 11y ago
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/nyregion/new-water-tunnel-can-provide-water-for-all-of-manhattan.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/17/nyregion/new-water-tunnel-...
> In one of the most significant milestones for the city’s water supply in nearly a century, the tunnel — authorized in 1954, begun in 1970 and considered the largest capital construction project ever undertaken in the five boroughs — will for the first time be equipped to provide water for all of Manhattan. Since 1917, the borough has relied on Tunnel No. 1, which was never inspected or significantly repaired after its opening.
> “When I came into office,” Mr. Bloomberg said, “I asked, ‘What could literally close down this city?’ And a water tunnel failure would have really done that.”
Manhattan is safe now, but eliminating the possibility of instantly plunging half of the most important city into the third world is more important than any of his other projects. This needs to cost him the election.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- baldfat 11y ago"It has been a long road for the third tunnel. Though construction began more than 40 years ago, it had to be stopped several times because there was not enough money." It's happened before when the issue was much bigger problem. Now it is less. I am sure it will cost him next to nothing.
- Eric_WVGG 11y agoThis whole thing is a non-story. They moved around some money in the budget and it got mis-reported. http://gothamist.com/2016/04/06/de_blasio_diggin_tunnels.php#photo-1 http://gothamist.com/2016/04/06/de_blasio_diggin_tunnels.php...