Weird that the headline and most of the story are completely at odds with the court decision they describe. Literally all the court seems to have said is that y

Weird that the headline and most of the story are completely at odds with the court decision they describe. Literally all the court seems to have said is that you have to make a decision about providing seats at cash desks on the basis of the task of working at the cash desk, and not based on the complete set of tasks the worker might have to do across the day. The employers are still free to argue that cashier will do better cashiering while standing up.