4 ms·
Valuable input...but if you say that there is nothing written in the article that is wrong, I am not sure how you can say that the article is wrong.
by DavidHm 11y ago
Valuable input...but if you say that there is nothing written in the article that is wrong, I am not sure how you can say that the article is wrong.
- itsame 10y agoMaybe the author wasn't wrong in the facts presented. But maybe he wasn't giving the another perspective that would alter your perception or understanding of whatever picture he was trying to paint. If you aren't given the full context, then you haven't fully understood the situation. If partial truths always lead to the correct conclusion, we would never have wrong convictions in courts caused by incomplete evidence. Or to bring the analogy closer to home, if we know only some (but not all) of the use cases, we can't know if our solution truly and completely solves whatever problem we're trying to solve. Maybe Floegipoky knows of another "use case" (insight) here that Dan Lyons happened to leave out.