I admire the research that went into collecting these signals, but I consider it a poor idea to have published what could be used as a checklist. I believe som

I admire the research that went into collecting these signals, but I consider it a poor idea to have published what could be used as a checklist. I believe some of the kind of people (criminals, bad people: you should stop) who take the technical actions listed certainly read hackernews. yet without exception all of these are easy to modify, losing your hard-won signals. better not to mention what they are. that said, perhaps they did not pubish all of the signals they found.