7 ms·

I'm yet to understand the hype. Perhaps there are users out there to whom it is appealing, but personally I don't see the need for the features they bring out l

I'm yet to understand the hype. Perhaps there are users out there to whom it is appealing, but personally I don't see the need for the features they bring out like notes in the browser or stacking tabs next to one another. These are things I can already do using standalone applications or a window manager. I would rather a browser be simple and most importantly stable and fast.

dvdgsng 11y ago
There is no need to "understand the hype", as a) there is none and b) it mostly comes down to personal preferences. When you're happy with your current workflow using other tools - that's totally fine, good for you. But, you know, there are people out there who are really looking forward to an alternative Browser-UI that 1) is very fast, 2) has a lot of configuration/features the others lack and 3) does not require you to install buggy/slow/tracking extensions for each and every single thing you want to change. e.g. having a vertical tab list out of the box is great, even when it still lacks some nice features from Tree Style Tabs.
- jsmeaton 11y ago
  I use Chrome as my main browser and the lack of vertical tabs is about the only thing that really frustrates me. It's almost enough to switch to Firefox.
- V-2 11y ago
  > 2) has a lot of configuration/features the others lack Such as? I find it less customizable than Firefox or Chrome
  - mateuszf 11y ago
    Vertical tabs - lot of users want it, but chrome devs close the feature requests.
    - V-2 11y ago
      Ah, ok. They are however available in Firefox as an extension, aren't they? Or at least that used to be the case
      - FreeFull 11y ago
        Yes, they are available with the Tree Style Tabs extension
      - arupauqa 11y ago
        I tried the Vivaldi version of this a few months ago and it unfortunately does not meet the feature set of Tree Style Tabs. It isn't a worthwhile alternative, for me.
Aoyagi 11y ago
I'm yet to understand all the attention smartphones get. Perhaps there are users out there to whom it is appealing, but personally I don't see the need for the features they bring out like address books and instant messaging in the phone or taking photos. These are things I can already do using standalone applications or other devices. I would rather a phone be simple and most importantly reliable and fast.
- Etheryte 11y ago
  I don't see you making a point that is relevant.
  - Aoyagi 11y ago
    I thought it was pretty clear. Maybe I should have used "Swiss army knife" instead of smartphones? The point is that Vivaldi is a toolbox. Some people like toolboxes.
    - Etheryte 11y ago
      I wouldn't say it's a toolbox, it's just another browser with some more sugar strapped to it out of the box. Coming back to your smartphone analogy, it's just another smartphone with more stock apps that many users don't want at all.
      - Aoyagi 11y ago
        You mean like pre-built toolboxes have some tools many people don't really want? Good thing people can choose the toolboxes they find the most ideal, even if it contains only a hammer and a duct type and a lot of empty space, isn't it? :) When Opera switched from Presto to Chromium, it was about as fast, but it was much lighter. Yet, almost every Opera fan/"customer" at the time was pretty mad. It was not because they were attached to Presto, but because of the huge feature depreciation. It's the features what made people use Opera until its 12th iteration, and some even use it today despite it having huge issues chewing through the bloat of JS on some sites.
agumonkey 11y ago
The tab tiling is interesting, maybe it can be made into a chrome extension (I wouldn't bet on it though).
veidr 11y ago
I personally think vertical tabs rule, and I remember them fondly from OmniWeb, but it's not something I would switch my main browser for.
- gtk40 11y ago
  I was introduced to them in Opera, but you can do it through extensions today. I use TreeStyleTab for example, and it's excellent.
rasz_pl 11y ago
The hype train was driven by old Opera enthusiast who long for full UI customizability and full _per domain_ configurability. Sadly Vivaldi delivers none of those, you cant even change mouse gestures :(

dvdgsng 11y ago

There is no need to "understand the hype", as a) there is none and b) it mostly comes down to personal preferences. When you're happy with your current workflow using other tools - that's totally fine, good for you. But, you know, there are people out there who are really looking forward to an alternative Browser-UI that 1) is very fast, 2) has a lot of configuration/features the others lack and 3) does not require you to install buggy/slow/tracking extensions for each and every single thing you want to change. e.g. having a vertical tab list out of the box is great, even when it still lacks some nice features from Tree Style Tabs.

jsmeaton 11y ago
I use Chrome as my main browser and the lack of vertical tabs is about the only thing that really frustrates me. It's almost enough to switch to Firefox.
V-2 11y ago
> 2) has a lot of configuration/features the others lack Such as? I find it less customizable than Firefox or Chrome
- mateuszf 11y ago
  Vertical tabs - lot of users want it, but chrome devs close the feature requests.
  - V-2 11y ago
    Ah, ok. They are however available in Firefox as an extension, aren't they? Or at least that used to be the case
    - FreeFull 11y ago
      Yes, they are available with the Tree Style Tabs extension
    - arupauqa 11y ago
      I tried the Vivaldi version of this a few months ago and it unfortunately does not meet the feature set of Tree Style Tabs. It isn't a worthwhile alternative, for me.

Aoyagi 11y ago

I'm yet to understand all the attention smartphones get. Perhaps there are users out there to whom it is appealing, but personally I don't see the need for the features they bring out like address books and instant messaging in the phone or taking photos. These are things I can already do using standalone applications or other devices. I would rather a phone be simple and most importantly reliable and fast.

Etheryte 11y ago
I don't see you making a point that is relevant.
- Aoyagi 11y ago
  I thought it was pretty clear. Maybe I should have used "Swiss army knife" instead of smartphones? The point is that Vivaldi is a toolbox. Some people like toolboxes.
  - Etheryte 11y ago
    I wouldn't say it's a toolbox, it's just another browser with some more sugar strapped to it out of the box. Coming back to your smartphone analogy, it's just another smartphone with more stock apps that many users don't want at all.
    - Aoyagi 11y ago
      You mean like pre-built toolboxes have some tools many people don't really want? Good thing people can choose the toolboxes they find the most ideal, even if it contains only a hammer and a duct type and a lot of empty space, isn't it? :) When Opera switched from Presto to Chromium, it was about as fast, but it was much lighter. Yet, almost every Opera fan/"customer" at the time was pretty mad. It was not because they were attached to Presto, but because of the huge feature depreciation. It's the features what made people use Opera until its 12th iteration, and some even use it today despite it having huge issues chewing through the bloat of JS on some sites.

agumonkey 11y ago

The tab tiling is interesting, maybe it can be made into a chrome extension (I wouldn't bet on it though).

veidr 11y ago

I personally think vertical tabs rule, and I remember them fondly from OmniWeb, but it's not something I would switch my main browser for.

gtk40 11y ago
I was introduced to them in Opera, but you can do it through extensions today. I use TreeStyleTab for example, and it's excellent.

rasz_pl 11y ago

The hype train was driven by old Opera enthusiast who long for full UI customizability and full _per domain_ configurability. Sadly Vivaldi delivers none of those, you cant even change mouse gestures :(