4 ms·
This is Robert Reich original idea, and quote. "It's time we eliminated the corporate income tax and made up the shortfall by increasing capital gains taxes. H
by marincounty 11y ago
This is Robert Reich original idea, and quote.
"It's time we eliminated the corporate income tax and made up the shortfall by increasing capital gains taxes. Here's the logic: First, the corporate income tax favors big companies that are able to shift their income abroad and engage in other tax-avoidance activities, while harming small companies that can't do any of this and therefore suffer a competitive disadvantage. Yet small companies are the engines of job growth in America.
Second, the people who actually pay the corporate income tax should properly be the company's shareholders, who are the legal owners of the company and who benefit from increases in its income. But in many cases, depending on the structure of the market, a significant share of the actual burden of paying the corporate income tax is often borne instead by employees in the form of lower wages, or consumers in the form of higher prices."
It sounds like a good idea, but capital gains are already high. My aunt lives in a house she bought for $25,000 in the 70's. She is far from well off. It's a crime what she's going to pay on capital gains if she sells her house.
Yea, I know about the ways around the tax, but they have downsides.
I'd be for this, if capital gains were tied to income. Maybe tied to the average income over the last 10 years?
Right now it's the same rate for a billionaire, and the old lady surviving on social security. My aunt is taking the same percentage tax hit on the sale of her investment as the billionaire?
- nicobn 11y agoIf you're talking about your aunt's primary residence, there is a capital gain exclusion of $250,000 (or $500,000 for married couples). Additionally, improvement costs, all sorts of taxes, fees, etc. can be excluded from capital gains, on top of the base exclusion. Obviously, in a high COL area, the sale price might be greater than the exclusion but it's pretty hard to argue that someone making a greater than 1,000% profit on an asset should not pay capital gain taxes on the gain above 1,000%. See: https://www.irs.gov/publications/p551/ar02.html#d0e301 https://www.irs.gov/publications/p551/ar02.html#d0e301 Your initial point still stands though. Capital gain tax rates are the same for everyone.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- whyenot 11y agoRight now that old lady on social security is likely paying property taxes that are 1/10th or less of what someone purchasing a similar house with the same market value would pay. Is that fair? If she has any children, she can even pass ownership of her home to them, and they will continue to pay her low property tax rate. (based on your username, I assume she lives in California)