3 ms·

Let me make my point more succinct. Digital systems could care less whether you're black, white, brown, red or yellow. If it turns out that one group is better

Let me make my point more succinct. Digital systems could care less whether you're black, white, brown, red or yellow. If it turns out that one group is better than another at innovation, design and implementation then so be it. It's simple. Usain Bolt is the best because of hard work, talent, and a belief in himself. He doesn't need diversity. He's competing in an arena where pure performance is all that matters. If I could beat him I would. I can't. But I'm not running around crying foul because I'm under-represented. If the author of this blasted article wants to be part of some Silicon Valley success story then let her sit in the library or computer lab for years at a time like everybody else.

_pius 17y ago
Digital systems could care less whether you're black, white, brown, red or yellow. This is a great point but it's not applicable here. I'd agree with your argument if the article were, for example, insinuating racism because code written by blacks and Hispanics had more bugs in it or had poor test coverage. That would be absurd; as you said, digital systems don't care about your race. Sadly, people usually do. Metrics like how fast you can run and how many users like your software are objective and essentially independent of race. The article wasn't talking about objective metrics like those but rather how many blacks and Hispanics are being hired — an area in which race-based discrimination is well-documented.