3 ms·
I am open to being convinced that you have new insights, but the reduced residue sets idea is not a magic bullet. If it was a magic bullet we would be having a
by theoh 11y ago
I am open to being convinced that you have new insights, but the reduced residue sets idea is not a magic bullet. If it was a magic bullet we would be having a different conversation.
Basically I am encouraging you to discuss this in a way or in a context in which people will engage more readily with your ideas, either to accept or reject them. HN is not full of number theorists.
Edit: This is a case where textual communication is really inadequate to determine the seriousness and, dare I say it, credibility of an interlocutor.
- goldenkey 11y agoYou can see Fred's papers here: http://arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Holt_F/0/1/0/all/0/1 http://arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Holt_F/0/1/0/all/0/1 You misunderstand me. I don't claim that the dRRS is a magic bullet. But it certainly isn't crank..