3 ms·
Yes, but what are the other comparable vehicles you found? Are you considering near-luxury vehicles like Cadillac and Lincoln? Because that's not in the same
by sixQuarks 11y ago
Yes, but what are the other comparable vehicles you found? Are you considering near-luxury vehicles like Cadillac and Lincoln? Because that's not in the same class as a Model S. The closest competitors were all in that list as far as I'm aware.
- basseq 11y agoJust posted above: I think the A6/5-Series/E-Class are closer to the Model S than A8/7-Series/S-Class. (The A7, 6-Series, and CLS are probably the best "direct" comparisons, but are also the "in-between" models in their lineups, where the Model S stands alone.)
- Someone1234 11y agoWell there is the rub. There is no set definition of what should or should not appear in that list. They're including vehicles (e.g. S class) which are $25-30K more than the Model S, so what is stopping us from including vehicles which are $25-30K cheaper than the Model S? What is the standard to appear on this list? Just to give an example, if I search for "Large Luxury Vehicles" and click the first link here is the list of vehicles: - Tesla Model S - Porsche Panamera - Audi A7 - Cadillac CT6 - Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class - Kia K900 - Infiniti Q70 - Cadillac XTS - Hyundai Equus - Acura RLX - Lincoln MKS Now there are two interesting things about this list: We see a lot new vehicles not on Tesla's list, and the price of these vehicles are a lot tighter than Tesla's list. For example no $96K S-Class listed here. It is hard to justify why some of these wouldn't be in Tesla's list, they're in the same ballpark price wise, they claim to offer luxury, and even the fit & finish seems to be as nice. So I'd argue Tesla's list is very arbitrary, there's no rhyme or reason, no set standard. Just a list that makes Tesla look good.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]