> See all the graffiti everywhere? Laws aren't protecting that art, au contraire. Is that really true? I would have thought that the art itself is still copyr

> See all the graffiti everywhere? Laws aren't protecting that art, au contraire. Is that really true? I would have thought that the art itself is still copyrighted, but the artist is unlikely to pursue redress as that would effectively be giving evidence of a crime (graffiti).